Term ‘landscape’ comes from a medieval conception of rural areas fading into distance. Then altered by aristocrats to associate it with luxury paintings and recreation, inspiring a greater cultural shift in the idea of nature–that beauty of a developed land is acceptable for its aesthetic appeal despite possible damage.
‘landscape of exclusion’–reconstructions of landscapes termed “natural” led to the exclusion of native peoples from their original rural homeland; led settlers to believe they were the first to arrive. used in urbanization, colonization, & industrialization propaganda
“emphasis on the brutality of enclosure and clearance” as socio-economic controllers
Black Act of 1792 prevented non-whites from using the Deer parks as hunting grounds
18th century trends in garden design recalibrated the public’s conception of nature from chaos to ordered perfect system
Dual cultural sense: Euro immigrants putting labor into nature in order to create property, whereas native americans seeing this as nature as hostage
Acid-rain is a product of glass, textile, and soap production
Cultural Primitivism idea that happiness is greatest nearest to nature, led to archetype of “the noble savage”
Seen today as backpacking trips, and appreciation for the spiritual and leveling qualities of nature, but no willingness to rid of Modern luxuries
nature as a conduit for human spirituality in transcendentalism
growing tenderness for animals, but concept that “some animals are more important than others remains”
Darwinism posed threat to man’s sense of self as developed beyond primitive behaviors of competition and sex, as well as Christian theology
Darwinism helped inspire animal and environmental rights
homosexuality in animals as example of distinction between culture and nature
Capitalism knowingly uses nature for short term pay off, despite long term damage
soil seen as eternal communal property
“ecology cannot put man first”
‘first nature’–original nature
‘second nature’–nature as altered by man
Environmentalism includes: preservation of endangered flora and fauna, protection of landscapes, animal rights, in addition to the reversal of pollution and overuse
New age environmentalism considers urban environments as nature too. Increased awareness of every single way we interact with nature in daily life. This will help to include those living in poverty, as this approach addresses the environmental abuses & conditions which perpetuate poverty
Black experience in America; urban environments as places of refuge. Natural landscapes can culturally represent forced labor and captivity
“Eco-socialist dystopia”, green movement as inaccessible, historically aligned with left
Danger lies in the ignorance of a nostalgic ideology that believes we can return to the idyllic past in order solve issues of the present and future
Postmodernism as the culprit for mankind’s disassociation from nature; diminishing it to a thing of media and literature; it no longer commands our wonder
How do represent nature if it has no voice? What is its true identity?
‘New ecology’ demands that we must think of a number of solutions at once inspired by chaos theory–acceptance that nature is chaotic and not one note will be the first step to the ‘renewal of nature’
We need to abandon our fixation on the “authentic wild”
nature cannot give us direction or solve our problems
we must urge to surpass the opposition of culture and nature, they must be united in a modern sense, merge to a grey area.
This entry was posted on Sunday, February 21st, 2016 at 11:52 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
A blog for Geography 360:
Ohio Wesleyan University